Mhyrr
 Basic Member Posts:271

 |
| 08 Aug 2005 12:09 PM |
|
Anybody have any? With the potential boost changes next year, could the RX7 be a player there again?
-Greg |
|
|
|
|
davebs14
 Veteran Member Posts:2377

 |
| 08 Aug 2005 12:19 PM |
|
Dunno? :-)
Who's got a Tri-Point car they wanna put HUGE wheels and tires on? :-)
David |
|
|
|
|
ratt_finkel
 Veteran Member Posts:1579

 |
| 08 Aug 2005 12:22 PM |
|
If you can get enough fuel for the fire, I think it could very well be right up there. I've seen 10's on stock turbos. Obviously much more to support that. But the potential is there. |
|
| Jeremy Foley
ASP#180 |
|
|
boxboy
 Advanced Member Posts:512

 |
| 08 Aug 2005 12:42 PM |
|
You can make 375ish rwhp on stock turbos at about 16psi. More boost than that and you are just generating heat. I'm not sure I'd go to huge tires since in ASP you'd be stuck with the stock 4.1 rear gear. With 285/18's (shortest big tire) and a 8500rpm redline you go 75mph in 2nd. Bigger tires would take you close to 80mph, which wouldn't be the best for off the corner grunt.
Not sure if the new rules would allow the wastegate to be ported. Creep is a problem at elevated boost levels and can make the turbo transition point abrupt.
Expect weight to be in the low-mid 2600's with SP rules. Competitive with a Z06? Probably some of the time, though I wouldn't want the stock gears.
-Andy |
|
|
|
|
AutoJim
 New Member Posts:

 |
| 09 Aug 2005 07:56 AM |
|
boxboy wrote: Not sure if the new rules would allow the wastegate to be ported.
I am: they don't. IF they are adopted. |
|
|
|
|
redrotorR1
 New Member Posts:

 |
| 09 Aug 2005 03:16 PM |
|
boxboy wrote:
You can make 375ish rwhp on stock turbos at about 16psi. More boost than that and you are just generating heat. I'm not sure I'd go to huge tires since in ASP you'd be stuck with the stock 4.1 rear gear. With 285/18's (shortest big tire) and a 8500rpm redline you go 75mph in 2nd. Bigger tires would take you close to 80mph, which wouldn't be the best for off the corner grunt.
Not sure if the new rules would allow the wastegate to be ported. Creep is a problem at elevated boost levels and can make the turbo transition point abrupt.
Expect weight to be in the low-mid 2600's with SP rules. Competitive with a Z06? Probably some of the time, though I wouldn't want the stock gears.
-Andy
375ish RWHP at 16psi might be a bit optimistic. I'd think 340ish RWHP is a more reliable target for an ASP 3rd gen RX-7, especially running the stock turbos. I'm not saying that you couldn't achieve 375 .... I just think you'd end up consuming high dollar parts at an alarming rate.
I read somewhere that Thomason's ASP C5 was around mid-2600's in weight. With an ASP C5/Z06 making ~400-420RWHP, it would seem that a well-prepped RX-7 with "unlimited" boost could be competitive. But it would have to be on courses that are transition and slalom heavy, IMO.
At any rate, I'd wait until the proposal was approved before I started counting my eggs. ;) |
|
|
|
|
SpyderVenom
 New Member Posts:

 |
| 10 Aug 2005 11:58 AM |
|
I'd look at a completely different car to be competitive. I believe that the 996TT makes 450hp stock and is AWD. I've heard reports of this platform making over 600hp with a boost chip and supporting intake and exhaust mods. |
|
|
|
|
davebs14
 Veteran Member Posts:2377

 |
| 11 Aug 2005 10:25 AM |
|
But it weighs 3400lbs in stock form. You'll have to do some work to get the understeer out as well. That's why my friend sold his and got a GT3. :-)
David |
|
|
|
|
s1mpsons
 Basic Member Posts:151

 |
| 12 Dec 2008 12:02 AM |
|
Bump back from the dead. It has been a few years now. Anyone have any new opinions on the possibiliy of a nationally competitive FD? Note: FWIW I've seen A6 275/35/15's fit an FD.
|
|
|
|
|
boxboy
 Advanced Member Posts:512

 |
| 12 Dec 2008 12:15 AM |
|
You should ask Dan Chadwick what he thinks after running his in ASP for awhile, and now prepping to SM2. Tire is not really the problem, gearing still is. I think a well prepped car could be competitive, but would be an A- car for the class. That's compared to a Z06. Given some of the other cars coming into the class like the S/C Elise, that might shift it down more.
The 275/15's would do good things for the thrust curve, but I think they'd have some trouble putting the power to the ground. Would be interesting to try.
-Andy M. |
|
|
|
|
ConeDodger
 New Member Posts:

 |
| 12 Dec 2008 01:08 AM |
|
dan runs is in my region and we have actually talked about putting me in an asp rx-7 to see what it could do . only problem is that i am a rookie driver and i cant find an rx-7 in my price range. there is an asp one in my region, but the driver is slow, but his car is for sale and isnt in the greatest condition and he wants 17k. if he could bring it down to 13k i could do that and finish prepping it. but dan seems to think the car could be competitive. |
|
|
|
|
dgeesaman
 New Member Posts:

 |
| 16 Dec 2008 12:44 PM |
|
ConeDodger wrote: dan runs is in my region and we have actually talked about putting me in an asp rx-7 to see what it could do . only problem is that i am a rookie driver and i cant find an rx-7 in my price range. there is an asp one in my region, but the driver is slow, but his car is for sale and isnt in the greatest condition and he wants 17k. if he could bring it down to 13k i could do that and finish prepping it. but dan seems to think the car could be competitive.
Now is a great time to buy a 3rd Gen RX-7. Prices in general have dropped quite a bit because 1) it's winter 2) it's a very expensive car wrt upkeep and 3) it's hardly practical. Now insert a serious recession and there are very few buyers.
So shop around. If there is one thing I know about 3rd Gens it's that you DON'T want to buy one that isn't in good condition for the price. Trying to fix up these things is costly and painful. It would be better to take a stockish car and build it up to ASP competition than to buy one that's semi-prepped but overall needs other work.
Dave |
|
|
|
|
ConeDodger
 New Member Posts:

 |
| 17 Dec 2008 01:02 AM |
|
this rx-7 is pretty prepped for asp and was built by dan chadwick also, so i know the tune and everything is good, only reason the car is slow is because of the current driver. |
|
|
|
|
Chiketkd
 New Member Posts:

 |
| 17 Dec 2008 09:45 AM |
|
Two questions:
1) How much whp/wtq can an FD RX-7 make in ASP trim?
2) What's the approximate weight of the car in SP trim? |
|
|
|
|
s1mpsons
 Basic Member Posts:151

 |
| 17 Dec 2008 12:06 PM |
|
Chiketkd wrote:Two questions:
1) How much whp/wtq can an FD RX-7 make in ASP trim?
2) What's the approximate weight of the car in SP trim? By my calculations I see 340 whp /310 wtq as the upper limit. I can see the weight dropping from 2800 lbs to 2650 lbs. My ASP RX7 = 315 whp / 290 wtq and weighs 2800 lbs. |
|
|
|
|
Chiketkd
 New Member Posts:

 |
| 17 Dec 2008 01:19 PM |
|
s1mpsons wrote:By my calculations I see 340 whp /310 wtq as the upper limit. I can see the weight dropping from 2800 lbs to 2650 lbs.
My ASP RX7 = 315 whp / 290 wtq and weighs 2800 lbs.
Am I right to assume that's weight w/o driver? I'm actually surprised your car weighs that much as SS RX-7's were able to get down into the 2,700lb range iirc. FWIW, my '06 RX-8 in BS trim weighed 2,830lbs on the scales at HPT. With race seats, no a/c, full exhaust, low fuel load, etc I would have thought a weight in the very low 2,600lbs range would be attainable???
On paper, the car looks like it *could* be a contender in ASP. While it's wider and heavier than the s/c Elise/Exige, it'll make more power. The vettes/vipers will have an even bigger power advantage but will be much heavier and wider. |
|
|
|
|
s1mpsons
 Basic Member Posts:151

 |
| 17 Dec 2008 01:24 PM |
|
How does a stock car shred 100 lbs? Exhaust, floor mats, jack, spare tire? |
|
|
|
|
Chiketkd
 New Member Posts:

 |
| 17 Dec 2008 01:33 PM |
|
s1mpsons wrote: How does a stock car shred 100 lbs? Exhaust, floor mats, jack, spare tire?
Technically my car has shed 200lbs from the official curb weight... [;)]
Fuel load is the biggest weight saver. After that you can reduce/eliminate the catback, floor mats, jack, windshield washer bottle fluid, etc. while runnning lightweight racing wheels & tires. |
|
|
|
|
s1mpsons
 Basic Member Posts:151

 |
| 17 Dec 2008 02:47 PM |
|
Fuel slosh is a problem and to prevent fuel starvation an FD with a stock tank should run over 1/2-3/4 of a tank in the RX7 (unless a fuel cell is swapped). The oem wheels weight only 15lbs (16x8) so there is not much to be gained there. For ASP I use the washer tank for water injection so that needs to stay full. My racing beat cat-back is not the lightest by far but might have saved me a little weight. Downpipe/pre-cat delete netted a little more weight loss. Also, I am running a Deka 9lbs battery and a lightweight flywheel. To get weight down to a minimum I need to lose the oem catted midpipe, A/C, the cat-back and get lightweight seats, fuel cell, coilovers, steering wheel. -Jake PS: I never said my car was fully prepped ;) |
|
|
|
|
Chiketkd
 New Member Posts:

 |
| 17 Dec 2008 03:17 PM |
|
s1mpsons wrote: PS: I never said my car was fully prepped ;)
True... [;)] |
|
|
|
|