cmt52663
 Basic Member Posts:414

 |
| 17 Sep 2010 03:00 AM |
|
Inquiring minds want to know...
If so, the number of credible candidates for the "tire to have" will rise again.
I can't wait for the coming winter's incarnation of the "Street Tires in Stock" thread.
[6] |
|
|
|
|
Andy Hollis
 Senior Member Posts:6197

 |
| 17 Sep 2010 05:01 AM |
|
cmt52663 wrote:Inquiring minds want to know...
If so, the number of credible candidates for the "tire to have" will rise again.
I can't wait for the coming winter's incarnation of the "Street Tires in Stock" thread.
[6] Goodyear already makes tons of tires eligible for ST. No news there.
--Andy |
|
|
|
|
cmt52663
 Basic Member Posts:414

 |
| 17 Sep 2010 05:16 AM |
|
through Dunlop certainly, but with their own brand? 140s? really?
i must have missed that... the asymmetrics go no smaller than 17" at present, right? wrong tire perhaps?
And by the way Andy - thanks for the driving demonstration at Nationals. Much appreciated and congrats.
Cheers,
Charlie
|
|
|
|
|
splash
 Advanced Member Posts:937

 |
| 17 Sep 2010 09:21 AM |
|
There are thousands of tires 'eligible' for ST classes, just less than 10 that are 'good' for them.... There are lots of tires within those thousands that are Goodyears, but none of them are in that 'good' range... (though there is one that is awfully good in the rain)...
|
|
|
|
|
cmt52663
 Basic Member Posts:414

 |
| 17 Sep 2010 04:54 PM |
|
the reason I asked is that I had a nice chat with a gent from Goodyear named Steve Petrescue after 3rd heat on Wednesday - and he seemed to be doing serious due diligence out in Nebraska.
perhaps I misunderstood...
I do appreciate the nice hat though, and the emblem thereon which he indicated would be the brand mark for the new tires. |
|
|
|
|
jzr
 Veteran Member Posts:1350

 |
| 17 Sep 2010 05:05 PM |
|
What's the new brand? |
|
|
|
|
cmt52663
 Basic Member Posts:414

 |
| 18 Sep 2010 01:58 PM |
|
IIRC it's not new - it's just the way it will be presented. only the "mercury's winged sandle" image will be used, not text. but with no one else reporting a similar encounter I may be making a new tire out of a mole hill here... |
|
|
|
|
Andy Hollis
 Senior Member Posts:6197

 |
| 18 Sep 2010 02:53 PM |
|
SEMA is where all the new stuff usually gets announced. --Andy
|
|
|
|
|
mwood
 Veteran Member Posts:2230

 |
| 18 Sep 2010 05:39 PM |
|
Yokohama was doing research, too...I hear... I wasn't able to be there this year, so I'm just repeating what I was told [:(] |
|
|
|
|
modernbeat
 Advanced Member Posts:841

 |
| 18 Sep 2010 07:45 PM |
|
This is a flashback from the late '80s. When I got started Yokohama, Goodyear and Bridgestone were the tires to have and compounds changed every year.
|
|
|
|
|
kjchristopher
 New Member Posts:

 |
| 19 Sep 2010 03:09 PM |
|
cmt52663 wrote: IIRC it's not new - it's just the way it will be presented. only the "mercury's winged sandle" image will be used, not text. but with no one else reporting a similar encounter I may be making a new tire out of a mole hill here... I saw him as well. Heard similar story after he walked by in grid.
|
|
|
|
|
Andy Hollis
 Senior Member Posts:6197

 |
| 19 Sep 2010 03:13 PM |
|
modernbeat wrote: This is a flashback from the late '80s. When I got started Yokohama, Goodyear and Bridgestone were the tires to have and compounds changed every year. Except that those were r-comps. Good ones. Goodyear had the special "O" compound, where your name had to be "on the list" to get, and you had to call "the man" on the phone. Yoko and Bridgestone sold the same tires to everyone and through normal retail channels. mwood wrote: Yokohama was doing research, too...I hear... I
wasn't able to be there this year, so I'm just repeating what I was
told [:(] Same guys that were at the Texas Tour. One of them (Colby) lives in Austin and hangs out at Soulspeed quite a bit.
--Andy |
|
|
|
|
mwood
 Veteran Member Posts:2230

 |
| 19 Sep 2010 05:43 PM |
|
modernbeat wrote: This is a flashback from the late '80s. When I got started Yokohama, Goodyear and Bridgestone were the tires to have and compounds changed every year.
Let's hope, in terms of ultimate escalation, it isn't deja vu all over again...[;)]
|
|
|
|
|
talon95
 Veteran Member Posts:1872

 |
| 19 Sep 2010 06:02 PM |
|
Andy Hollis wrote:Except that those were r-comps. Hmmm....
|
|
|
|
|
Andy Hollis
 Senior Member Posts:6197

 |
| 19 Sep 2010 06:03 PM |
|
mwood wrote:modernbeat wrote: This is a flashback from the late '80s. When I got started Yokohama, Goodyear and Bridgestone were the tires to have and compounds changed every year.
Let's hope, in terms of ultimate escalation, it isn't deja vu all over again...[;)]
The big difference is that, back in the day, we knew it was happening and openly encouraged it. R-comps were the "drug of choice" of a new generation of autocrossers. Now, we are openly looking out for it and discouraging it in the street tire classes. I worry less about the actual tires and more about shenanigans such as "special tires for special people". The latter takes a lot longer to figure out.
--Andy PS: There has been talk of Goodyear bringing out a new line of r-comps for over a year now. Perhaps that is what was really being discussed?
|
|
|
|
|
mwood
 Veteran Member Posts:2230

 |
| 19 Sep 2010 06:52 PM |
|
Andy Hollis wrote:mwood wrote:
modernbeat wrote: This is a flashback from the late '80s. When I got started Yokohama, Goodyear and Bridgestone were the tires to have and compounds changed every year.
Let's hope, in terms of ultimate escalation, it isn't deja vu all over again...[;)]
The big difference is that, back in the day, we knew it was happening and openly encouraged it. R-comps were the "drug of choice" of a new generation of autocrossers. Now, we are openly looking out for it and discouraging it in the street tire classes.
I worry less about the actual tires and more about shenanigans such as "special tires for special people". The latter takes a lot longer to figure out.
I can see your point. Is the STAC planning on being even more proactive in managing an exclusion list? Seems that is the only possible way of policing, as we all know the tread wear rating issues and liberties that manufacturers will take to create an unfair advantage.
As far as "special tires for special people", in the spirit of ST*, I would just put that in the category of outright cheating. If a competitor were willing to play that game to "win" and was caught, I would put both the competitor and manufacturer on probation for at least one year. There's no place for that crap in a grass roots sport like Solo. |
|
|
|
|
Andy Hollis
 Senior Member Posts:6197

 |
| 20 Sep 2010 03:42 AM |
|
mwood wrote:I can see your point. Is the STAC planning on being even more proactive in managing an exclusion list? Seems that is the only possible way of policing, as we all know the tread wear rating issues and liberties that manufacturers will take to create an unfair advantage. Ummm, where ya been, Mike? [:)] There've been huge threads on this earlier in the year. And a rules change proposal adding some more restrictive verbiage (teeth) to the ST tire allowance. I don't see vigilance amping up beyond where it is today, but I'd put it at a solid Def Con 4. STAC will go on Ready 5 around SEMA time, though. [quote]
As far as "special tires for special people", in the spirit of ST*, I would just put that in the category of outright cheating. If a competitor were willing to play that game to "win" and was caught, I would put both the competitor and manufacturer on probation for at least one year. There's no place for that crap in a grass roots sport like Solo. No doubt, and there are rules specifically against it. But it is always a possibility for a motivated manufacturer. Yet another reason to keep out the small, specialty folks who make their living specifically building real race tires.
--Andy |
|
|
|
|
IanF
 Basic Member Posts:136

 |
| 20 Sep 2010 04:55 AM |
|
Andy Hollis wrote: Yet another reason to keep out the small, specialty folks who make their living specifically building real race tires.
--Andy
I suppose that's why Hoosier hasn't bothered to offer a 140 TW tire - they assume they would instantly put on the exclusion list? |
|
|
|
|
snaponbob
 Veteran Member Posts:2830

 |
| 20 Sep 2010 05:54 AM |
|
The Goodyear guy was in the B/SP and A/SP grid as well. Currently, Goodyear already has (and has had) R-Comps in quite of few sizes, but they are R6 equivalent for road racing, not A6 equivalent. Claims of 'less camber needed', 'will last a bit longer', 'quicker', 'same price points', etc., were tossed about. IF they come out with A6 equivalents (the way he was talking) don't expect a huge selection. The questions kept coming back to 'what are the most common sizes' and 'how many cars would use this (X) size'. Andy, thanks for the flashback. I remember all that stuff about special tires.
|
|
| Bob Buxbaum
STX E36 328
KC Region |
|
|
MNbiker
 Veteran Member Posts:1039

 |
| 20 Sep 2010 06:55 AM |
|
snaponbob wrote: Claims of 'less camber needed', 'will last a bit longer', 'quicker', 'same price points', etc., were tossed about. IF they come out with A6 equivalents I don't doubt this is possible, if Goodyear decides to move forward. They already seem to have delivered pretty effectively with slicks (Exhibit 1: 2010 DM and EM results). |
|
|
|
|